Skip to content

ACFOR Scale

Counting individuals or estimating percentage cover precisely can be slow, so ecologists sometimes use a quick subjective abundance scale. The most common is the ACFOR scale, in which each species in a quadrat or area is given a letter:A = Abundant
C = Common
F = Frequent
O = Occasional
R = RareSome versions add D for Dominant at the top (the DAFOR scale), and many surveys agree a band of percentage cover for each letter, with A the highest and R the lowest.Advantages:
- Quick and easy, so a large area can be surveyed in a short time.
- No counting of individuals is needed, so it works for plants such as grasses that are hard to tell apart.Disadvantages:
- It is subjective: two people may give the same quadrat different ratings, so results are less reproducible.
- It produces ordinal (ranked) data rather than measurements, so a mean cannot be calculated. The letters can be converted to numbers for comparison, for example A = 5, C = 4, F = 3, O = 2 and R = 1, but this does not turn them into true measurements.
- Large, conspicuous species tend to be over-rated and small ones under-rated.To reduce subjectivity, the same person should make all the ratings, or everyone should agree the cover band for each letter before starting.ACFOR is most useful for a first survey of a site, before more detailed quantitative sampling.

Read the text

Read the text and highlight anything you think is important. When you go on, the text is hidden and you answer from memory.