Skip to content

Example Calculation - 4

This worked example uses uncertainty to evaluate an experimental result.Question: in an experiment to measure the enthalpy change of neutralisation, the temperature of the mixture rose from 19.5 °C to 26.0 °C. The thermometer is read to ± 0.5 °C. The student's value was −45 kJ mol-1; the data book value is −57 kJ mol-1. Can the difference be explained by the uncertainty in the temperature measurement?Step 1: percentage uncertainty in the temperature rise.temperature rise = 26.0 − 19.5 = 6.5 °C, with uncertainty 0.5 + 0.5 = ± 1.0 °Cpercentage uncertainty = (1.0 ÷ 6.5) × 100 = 15.4%Step 2: percentage difference from the accepted value.percentage difference = ((57 − 45) ÷ 57) × 100 = 21%Step 3: compare. The difference (21%) is larger than the measurement uncertainty (15.4%, the largest source of uncertainty here). So the uncertainty alone cannot explain the result, and there must also be a systematic error.Evaluation: the result is less exothermic than expected, which fits heat being lost to the surroundings, a systematic error that makes every temperature rise too small. Improvements: insulate the cup and fit a lid, and use a thermometer read to ± 0.1 °C to cut the percentage uncertainty.The general rule: if the percentage difference is within the total percentage uncertainty, the method is acceptable and the difference is due to the apparatus; if it is greater, look for systematic errors in the method.

Read the text

Read the text and highlight anything you think is important. When you go on, the text is hidden and you answer from memory.

Specification: Edexcel Chemistry (8CH0), AS-level. Topic: Errors and Uncertainties.

Key terms in this lesson

systematic error
An error that shifts every reading by the same amount in the same direction, caused by the apparatus or method rather than chance.

More in Errors and Uncertainties

All 14 lessons in Errors and Uncertainties · All Edexcel AS-level Chemistry topics